
Having seen a video on YouTube of a (Canadian!) fellow who climbed a really tall tree, we thought it might be fun to tackle the big White Pine out back — see how far up we can get, find out how tall the tree is, and maybe snap a photo or two from a decent height.

From this view (if you’ll excuse the choppy photo-stitching), it certainly seems that trees like this are really made for climbing. The branches at the base are sturdy and well-spaced. It doesn’t take long, however, before diligent young climbers encounter tree sap, which is in fact quite sticky. Reaching up to grab a hold, you find that the tree grabs back! It has a way of getting around, too — exposed skin, clothing, and cameras all become covered in the stuff. On the plus side, its extreme tackiness helps with your grip as you continue the ascent… I wonder if they ought to use it at rock climbing gyms, instead of that white chalky stuff.
Anyhow, we made it roughly half way up — which turned out to be about 30 feet off the ground.

At this point the branches seemed to become smaller and more dense — which doesn’t necessarily make for easier climbing. But we could see out over the canopy:

Not the most dramatic view perhaps, but the country is so flat ’round these parts that you can see for a good piece even from a mere 30 feet up.
So, how old is the tree? It’s too bad that the easiest way of determining this involves chopping it down and looking at the rings. I suppose that you could take a core sample, just like they do with polar ice. That wasn’t really in the plans today, so the tree’s age remains unknown.
One Comment
This is certainly the oldest White Pine around here, and in 2000, when we cleared up the limbs from the 1998 ice-storm (which produced all the stubs you climbed on) we found a branch, still present, 15cm from the ground level, showing that this was an open-grown tree that hadn’t been grazed around.
We’ve got photos of the scene at the top of this article from late winter 1998, which look much more similar to photos of a World War I battleground than yours does — but one can still be astonished by remembering the amount of ice which was necessary to snap off all the limbs that are stubs in your photos.